When I was in Bible college I acquired (and read) a little booklet by Benjamin B. Warfield titled The Religious Life of Theological Students, originally delivered as an address at Princeton Theological Seminary on October 4, 1911. In the opening pages Warfield is dealing with the qualifications of Christian ministers. I was going to pull an excerpt out of these two paragraphs, but on second thought I’ll reproduce them (nearly) in full. Close to the heart of his words, I think, is the supposed incompatibility of study (including the Bible) and prayer. Here is what he had to say (all bold emphasis is mine):
I am asked to speak you you on the religious life of the student of theology. I approach the subject with some trepidation. I think it the most important subject which can engage our thought. You will not suspect me, in saying this, to be depreciating the importance of the intellectual preparation of the student for ministry. The importance of the intellectual preparation of the student for the ministry is the reason of the existence of our Theological Seminaries. Say what you will, do what you will, the ministry is a “learned profession”; and the man without learning, no matter with what other gifts he may be endowed, is unfit for his duties. But learning, though indispensable, is not the most indispensable thing for a minister. “Apt to teach” — yes, the minister must be “apt to teach”; and observe that what I say — or rather what Paul says — is “apt to teach.” Not apt merely to exhort, to beseech, to appeal, to entreat; not even merely, to testify, to bear witness; but to teach. And teaching implies knowledge: he who teaches must know. Paul, in other words, requires of you, as we are perhaps learning not very felicitously to phrase it, “instructional,” not merely “inspirational,” service. But aptness to teach alone does not make a minister; nor is it his primary qualification. It is only one of a long list of requirements which Paul lays down as necessary to meet in him who aspires to this high office. And all the rest concern, not his intellectual, but his spiritual fitness. A minister must be learned, on pain of being utterly incompetent for his work. But before and above being learned, a minister must be godly.
Nothing could be more fatal, however, than to set these two things over against one another. Recruiting officers do not dispute whether it is better for soldiers to have a right leg or a left leg: soldiers should have both legs. Sometimes we hear it said that ten minutes on your knees will give you a truer, deeper, more operative knowledge of God than ten hours over your books. “What!” is the appropriate response, “than ten hours over your books, on your knees?” Why should you turn from God when you turn to your books, or feel that you must turn from your books in order to turn to God? If learning and devotion are as antagonistic as that, then the intellectual life is in itself accursed, and there can be no question of a religious life for a student, even of theology. . . .In your case there can be not “either — or” here — either a student or a man of God. You must be both.
He then goes on to connect this with the doctrine of vocation (work, calling), and while it’s not directly related to the point of this blog post, it does relate to some earlier posts on this blog, so I’ll include these next paragraphs for anyone interested in the subject of “work.” What he has to say about “work” applies to everybody, not just “theological students”: